The United States is an extremely linguistically various place, with speakers of many languages. Thus giving rise to a sizable and highly varied group of English dialects and accents. While this diversity is seen as a positive facet of American society, there are incredibly real-and often negative-consequences of the nonstandard means of speaking. Research has proven that persons make extremely swift, subconscious judgments about others predicated on a number of factors, including their speech. Studies which may have been done to gauge the impact of language on how speakers happen to be perceived overwhelmingly present that Americans tend to judge people that have nonstandard accents unfavorably. Spanish speakers and the ones of Latino descent certainly are a significant group in america, so how they are perceived is normally a crucial topic. The question I'd like to explore is normally how speakers of the English dialect Chicano English are perceived, particularly searching at the participant's own background and how it could change these results.
The study this question is due to is certainly one from the University of California, LA that was completed by Bradford Arthur and co-workers. In this experiment, Anglo-American UCLA students' attitudes relating to Chicano and Normal American English were studied. They achieved this by using a matched guise method where 4 speakers were documented speaking in both a Chicano and SAE dialect (Bradford, Farrar, & Arthur, 1974). Only using 4 speakers for the 8 recordings permits the researchers never to have to consider the speech habits of individuals having an impact on the participants. The participants were